Benefits of Trading

An Analysis on the Benefits of Free Trade

An Analysis of the Benefits of Free Trade

“The analysis of free trade benefits is important as protectionist policies make consumers pay more for certain products or services and prevent international markets from opening up. Protectionism stifles free trade.” Why is this analysis of the benefits of free trade critical? The study is important because it highlights why we need free trade. First, because competition can be a good thing, and there are many benefits when consumers compete and buy products or services that otherwise would not be sold if competitors did not exist.


Second, because free trade increases choices and allows consumers to exercise more control over their lives, it would be challenging to go shopping without leaving your house. Still, it would be even harder to go on the Internet without leaving your home. Because of this freedom to shop and do what you want, buyers and sellers can negotiate freely to reach an agreement about prices. Without competition, prices would reflect what would happen in the market–costly purchases by consumers with little regard for other buyers or sellers would drive costs upward and, since consumers have the power to set prices, we would end up with a situation where businesses were forced to charge higher fees to cover their overhead expenses, which hurt the consumer and lowered the value of the goods and services sold. Without free trade, the result would be less choice, more price differences, and decreased growth.


With this analysis on the benefits of free trade, why is protectionism bad? Protectionism is the practice of government intervention to limit competition so that a company or entity can successfully operate in a free market. In the case of protectionism, the government attaches tariffs or other fees to discourage people from entering a marketplace that it does not control. Taxes and fees often have a damaging impact on businesses, tiny ones, and create a market inefficiency because of the distortions caused by regulation.

protectionist policies

Some economists argue that protectionist policies are necessary because a free market allows goods and services to donate at the best possible price. Other economists say that regulation and high costs create inefficient markets and let consumers take advantage of other price advantages. This is the approach taken in the analysis of the benefits of free trade. The protectionist policies examined limit competition through tariffs, price controls, licensing restrictions, or subsidies. While some protectionist policies may have legitimate uses, most are arbitrary and have damaging impacts on the economy.


Tariffs and fees are harmful to consumers. They prevent consumers from buying products at reasonable prices. Tariffs raise utility bills and limit consumer choice, while fees increase the cost of goods and services and make the products more expensive. Whether protectionist policies benefit the economy is a debatable question.


In a free market, the government attempts to achieve its goals by allowing consumers to choose the products they want and supply freely. By enabling consumers this freedom, businesses are allowed to prosper. This allows the free market to distribute wealth more evenly. If no effort is made to foster economic growth, the result will be the under-utilization of potential resources. If development is encouraged, it results in more output and higher prices for consumers.

analysis of the benefits of free trade

The analysis of the benefits of free trade concludes that there are two significant ways that a free market provides more excellent value than government intervention. First, the absence of governmental intervention results in lower rates of price elasticity. Second, free trade reduces the role of government intervention by removing barriers to entry and promoting competition. A reduction in government regulation and protectionism also increases overall economic welfare because the costs are shifted away from the government and transferred to consumers.


The analysis further concludes that protectionist policies do not benefit society because their costs on firms and consumers far outweigh their benefits. Protectionist policies hinder free trade because they limit competition and raise prices. A firm’s decision to enter a market is influenced by both demand and supply conditions in a free market. However, if the government tries to protect the domestic industry, it restricts entry, increases costs, and harms consumer welfare.

Comment here